The Tradewater Blog

Learn about fighting climate change and reducing the world's carbon footprint. Check out our blog posts for our latest projects, sustainability, and more.

Latest Posts

Gabe & Ana at Basel COP 2025 Behind the Scenes at the 2025 Basel Convention COP Learn More
The Role of Carbon Credits in Higher Education’s Sustainability Journey Learn More
Buyer Coalitions and the Carbon Market: Demand-Side Innovation Learn More
Bridging the Grid Gap: Data Center Sustainability in Fossil-Fuel Dependent Regions Learn More
How Credit Streaming Can Transform the Market for Methane Abatement Learn More
Interview: Jenny Morgan of Tradewater and Anne Pisor of Fortifyd Learn More
Coho and Tradewater: a partnership built on shared vision Learn More
The Tradewater team posing for a picture at 2023's retreat. 9 ways Tradewater made a difference in 2023, and our outlook for the new year Learn More
How Tradewater is tackling the big methane emissions problem  Learn More
Organizations are investing in their values – 401Ks and beyond Learn More
Accounting for refrigerants: Toward a sustainable business Learn More
Daniel Ulloa scuba diving From the classroom to the reefs: Daniel’s journey to a climate career Learn More
The history of refrigerants Learn More
Sean Kinghorn and his family Looking Beyond Your Footprint: An Interview with Sean Kinghorn Learn More
Harnessing Human Ingenuity to Save Our Planet—and Ourselves Learn More
Remembering our Common Goal: Saving the Planet Learn More
Why Trust is the Real Currency of Carbon Offsets Learn More
Why Going Beyond Conventional Offsetting is Critical Today Learn More
Tim Brown, Tradewater's CEO, giving a speech Global partnerships pave the way for increased efforts to prevent catastrophic climate change Learn More
Tradewater staff working on a warehouse Why This Work Matters Now Learn More
Picture of refrigerant canisters Carbon Offset Credits: Not a Punchline Learn More
Image of mountains surrounding a lake 2022: A Milestone Year for Tradewater Learn More
Eye glasses looking at the sun setting behind the horizon Our Vision for 2023 Learn More
Tradewater B Impact Assessment Score Why Tradewater Became a Certified B Corp Learn More
Image of a conference keynote and the ability to use the Tradewater Event Emissions Calculator to offset your footprint. Calculating Event Emissions to Take Sustainable Action Learn More
Why I Left Tech to Join Tradewater Learn More
Picture representing cryptocurrencies 5 Environmental Stories We’re Following in 2022 Learn More
Picture of a field after rain The Social Cost of Carbon Learn More
Refrigerant in the Dominican Republic, stored on the back of a pick-up truck Destroying Refrigerant in the Dominican Republic Learn More
Picture of high buildings taken from the ground Addressing Refrigerants Makes Companies Leaders in the Climate Fight Learn More
Picture of a potted plant over a table Small Businesses Can Now Join Together to Fight Climate Change Learn More
Picture of clouds taken above said clouds Climate Heroes Wanted – Our 2021 Goals Learn More

Permanence

Emission reductions are considered permanent if they are not reversible. In some projects, such as forestry or soil preservation, carbon offset credits are issued based upon the volume of CO2 that will be sequestered over future decades—but human actions and natural processes such as forest fires, disease, and soil tillage can disrupt those projects. When that happens, the emission reductions claimed by the project are reversed.

The destruction of halocarbon does not carry this risk. All destruction activities in Tradewater’s projects are conducted pursuant to the Montreal Protocol , which requires “a destruction process” that “results in the permanent transformation, or decomposition of all or a significant portion of such substances.” Specifically, the destruction facilities Tradewater uses must meet or exceed the recommendations of the UN Technology & Economic Assessment Panel , which approves certain technologies to destroy halocarbons, including the requirement that the technology achieve a 99.99% or higher “destruction and removal efficiency.” Simply put, this means that Tradewater’s technologies ensure that over 99.99% of the chemicals are permanently destroyed. During the destruction process, a continuous emission monitoring system is used to ensure full destruction of the ODS collected.

Accuracy

Some carbon offset projects necessarily rely on estimations or assumptions when calculating the emission reductions from project activities. Forestry projects, where developers make assumptions about the carbon that will be sequestered over future decades if trees are conserved, are a perfect example. Such projects sometimes result in an overestimation of the environmental benefit of the project.

Tradewater’s halocarbon projects avoid the issue of overestimation by consistently conducting extremely precise testing and measurement of the amount of refrigerant destroyed in each project.

  • Every container of ODS that Tradewater destroys is weighed by a third-party using regularly calibrated scales. The ODS is then sampled by a third-party and analyzed by an accredited refrigerant laboratory to determine its species and purity. These two steps combine to ensure that credits are issued only for the precise volume and type of refrigerant destroyed.
  • The destruction facilities that Tradewater uses continuously monitor the incineration process during destruction events to ensure that over 99.99% of the ODS is destroyed. This monitoring is mandated by regulatory protocols and is part of the verification process to which projects are subjected.
  • Tradewater accounts for the project emissions created during the collection, transport, and destruction of ODS, and the number of offsets issued is reduced by a corresponding amount. The protocols that we use also build in other reductions to account for substitute chemicals that will be used to replace the destroyed refrigerants. Tradewater publishes this information in the documentation for all its ODS destruction projects. These documents outline how the material was obtained, the project emissions calculations, the test results, and the amount and type of ODS chemicals destroyed, among other information.

    • Additionality

    It is a basic requirement of all carbon offset projects that the underlying project activities are additional. “Additional” means that the projects would not happen in the absence of a carbon market. Tradewater’s halocarbon projects simply would not happen – and the gases would be left to escape into the atmosphere – without the sale of the resulting carbon offset credits. This is because there is no mandate to collect and destroy these gases. It is still permissible to buy, sell, and use halocarbons that were produced before the ban. There are other reasons halocarbon destruction projects are additional:

    • There are no incentives or financial mechanisms to encourage halocarbon destruction. According to the International Energy Agency and United Nations Environment Program, “there is rarely funding nor incentive” to recover and destroy ozone depleting substances in storage tanks and discarded equipment. And collecting, transporting, and destroying halocarbons is time-intensive and expensive. The burden to collect and destroy these gases therefore remains prohibitive outside of carbon offset markets—meaning that if organizations like Tradewater do not do this work, nobody else will.
    • Countries are not focused on the need to collect and destroy halocarbons. The Montreal Protocol has been celebrated as a success because of its production ban. This success, however, ignores the legacy gases produced before the ban and is a blind spot for government regulators. In the U.S., for example, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) developed a Vintaging Model in the 1990s to estimate the quantify of ozone depleting substances left in circulation. Based on the inputs and assumptions put into the model, the EPA predicted that no CFCs would be available for recovery beyond 2020 in the United States. But this prediction did not prove accurate. Tradewater has collected and destroyed more than 1.5 million pounds of CFCs globally in recent years and continues to identify thousands of pounds per week.
    • International carbon accounting standards do not require corporations to measure or track emissions tied to halocarbons, and refrigerants are specifically excluded from Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) commitments. These commitments derive from emissions reporting under the GHG Protocol, which requires companies to report on emissions only from new generation refrigerants, such as hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), but does not establish any obligation to report inventories or emissions of refrigerants still in use, such as CFCs and HCFCs. All these factors combine to make Tradewater’s carbon offset projects highly additional. As Giving Green, an initiative of IDinsight, concluded: “Tradewater would not exist without the offset market, so this element of additionality is clearly achieved.” The case for additionality is not so clear for some other project types, such as forestry and landfill gas carbon projects. For example, some forests are already being conserved for their beauty, or for use as parks, and generate carbon offset credits only because those conservation efforts do not yet have full formal protection in place to avoid deforestation in the future. Similarly, methane from landfills can be used to make electricity or captured as compressed natural gas, thereby creating additional revenue streams to support the activities, beyond the sale of carbon credits.